Written Answer to PQ on Prevalence of non-compliance with overtime regulations and study on impact on workers

NOTICE PAPER NO. 3390 OF 2025 FOR THE SITTING ON OR AFTER 5 FEBRUARY 2025
QUESTION NO. 6511 FOR WRITTEN ANSWER

MP: Mr Gerald Giam Yean Song

To ask the Minister for Manpower (a) in the past three years, how many cases of inflated job titles to avoid paying overtime have been investigated and what proportion of such cases are substantiated; (b) what are the safeguards to prevent such practices and whether targeted audits are planned; (c) whether the Ministry has conducted studies to assess the impact of non-compliance with overtime regulations on burnout among workers; and (d) what enforcement measures are being considered to combat this issue.

Answer:

1. The prevalence of misclassification to avoid paying overtime pay remains low. In the past 3 years, the Tripartite Alliance for Dispute Management (TADM) received an average of 45 claims per year from employees who felt they were misclassified and denied of overtime. This can include cases where the employee felt that their job titles were being inflated. TADM found about 30% of these claims to be valid and employers were advised to make due compensation. In handling such cases, the employee’s job title is not a relevant factor. Rather, each case is assessed individually based on the specific scope of the job, such as the level of decision-making powers in managing a business function.

2. To safeguard against the non-payment of overtime pay and other breaches of employment laws, MOM regularly conducts Workright outreach campaigns and around 5,000 Workright inspections yearly to check on employers’ compliance with the Employment Act. Employers found to have lapses will be referred to Employment Act clinics for training and rectification. If the lapses identified are more severe or systemic, we will take a strong stance and more serious enforcement actions such as fines and prosecution will be taken.

3. On the issue of overtime leading to burnout, MOM has so far not conducted studies to assess how non-compliance with overtime regulations impacts burnout. Nonetheless, we have put in place various legislative safeguards to protect the well-being of workers and ensure that they have sufficient rest. For example, employers must provide 1 rest day per week and are restricted from contractually binding employees to work more than 8 hours in one day or more than 44 hours in one week. Under the Workplace Safety and Health Act, employers are also required to conduct proper risk assessment of work activities and manage their employees’ workload and work shift so as to manage fatigue.